Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Space, Place and the Production of Knowledge Conference

April 8th and 9th 2011.

The Space, Place and The Production of Knowledge Conference at UH Manoa seeks to explore the sites where place-based cultures and practices meet with scholarship.  This includes an examination of how region and environment influences scholars and their methods.

SPPOK represents academic work from over fifteen different academic fields! In addition, the schedule features spoken word by Travis Kaululaau Thompson (AKA Travis T), art exhibits, opening remarks by the Dean of the Graduate Division Patricia Cooper and an authors panel from Value of Hawaii. Traditional scholarly papers will be bolstered with art and media formats that embody the SPPOK belief that the production of knowledge exists not only in regionally specific contexts but also takes diverse forms.

Special event: In conjunction with SPPOK the ASGSA and SAPFB will present a special evening of food and fun in an alternate approach to social justice topics.

Critical Regionalisms, on the evening of April 8 will feature music, spoken word, performance and an audiovisual short talk on Text Mex.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

EPA Accepting Applications for Environmental Education Grant Funding

EPA Accepting Applications for Environmental Education Grant Funding
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is accepting grant applications for $1.9 million in funding for environmental education projects and programs. The purpose of the grants is to promote environmental stewardship and help develop knowledgeable and responsible students, teachers and citizens. EPA expects to award at least 20 grants nationwide ranging from a minimum of $15,000 to a maximum of $100,000 and will accept applications until May 2, 2011.

The grants provide financial support for innovative projects that design, demonstrate, and/or disseminate environmental education practices, methods, or techniques. Projects should involve environmental education activities that go beyond disseminating information.

EPA will be hosting two conference calls for potential applicants interested in additional information about the application process. The conference calls will take place on March 21, 2011 at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and April 6 at 2 p.m. (EDT). To participate in the conference calls, dial: 1-866-379-5082, and use conference ID number: 48699133 for the call on March 21. Use conference ID number: 48696117 for the call on April 6.

The Environmental Education Grant Program provides funding to local education agencies, state education or environmental agencies, colleges or universities, not-for-profit organizations, or noncommercial educational broadcasting entities. Tribal education agencies, which are controlled by an Indian tribe, band or nation, may also apply, including a school or community college.

Since the program began, EPA has provided more than $50 million in funding to more than 3,000 agencies and organizations.

More information on eligibility and application materials:
http://www.epa.gov/enviroed/grants.html
 
Note: If a link above doesn't work, please copy and paste the URL into a browser. 

USDA Announces Fiscal Year 2011 Sign-up for $300,000 in Conservation Innovation Grants

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

News from U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service
300 Ala Moana Blvd., #4-118, Honolulu, HI  96850

USDA Announces Fiscal Year 2011 Sign-up for $300,000 in Conservation Innovation Grants

Honolulu, March 22, 2011-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Director Larry Yamamoto today announced the availability of program funding for Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) for fiscal year (FY) 2011 in the Pacific Islands Area. The CIG program is designed to stimulate the development and adoption of innovative conservation approaches and technologies.

"The Pacific Islands Area is again offering our cooperators the opportunity to demonstrate new technologies and approaches in conservation," stated Larry Yamamoto, NRCS Director of the Pacific Islands Area.  "This grant allows us to showcase unique methods to conserve our natural resources specific to our islands," he continued.

The Department of Agriculture's NRCS administers CIG. For FY 2011 up to $300,000 is available for the State Component CIG competition. Funds for single- or multi-year projects, not to exceed three years, will be awarded through a competitive grants process with applications accepted from the Pacific Islands Area (Hawaii, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands).

Applicants should explain the geographic area that the project would benefit including information about the natural resource concern. Applicants should also describe the innovative technologies or approaches which will be used to address the natural resource conservation concern. Other requirements are identified in the Announcement of Program Funding.

Funding for CIG is made available through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). All proposed CIG projects must involve EQIP-eligible producers. CIG funds that are used to provide direct or indirect payments to individuals or entities to implement structural, vegetative or management practices are subject to the EQIP payment limitation. CIG is not a research program, but rather a tool to stimulate the adoption of conservation approaches or technologies that have been studied sufficiently to indicate a high likelihood of success, and are likely candidates for eventual technology transfer.

CIG will fund projects targeting innovative on-the-ground conservation, including pilot projects and field demonstrations. Technologies and approaches that are commonly used in the geographic area covered by the application, and which are eligible for funding through EQIP, are not eligible for funding through CIG. Proposed projects must conform to the description of innovative conservation projects or activities published in the Announcement of Program Funding.

CIG funds pilot projects and conservation field trials that can last from one to three years. Grants for approved projects cannot exceed 50 percent of the total project cost. The federal contribution for a single project cannot exceed $75,000. At least 50 percent of the total cost of the project must come from non-Federal matching funds (cash and in-kind contributions) provided by the grantee. While NRCS will provide technical oversight for each project receiving an award, the grantee is responsible for providing the technical assistance required to successfully complete the project.

Applications must be received in the NRCS Honolulu State Office by close of business May 20, 2011. Applications should be sent to: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service; Conservation Innovation Grants Program; ATTN: Jeff Harlow; 300 Ala Moana Blvd, Ste 4-118 Honolulu, HI 96850. To view the complete Announcement of Program Funding, visit http://www.pia.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/cig/index.html.

To find the office nearest you, visit www.pia.nrcs.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider.

###

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Please Help Keawanui Fishpond Recover from Tsunami Damage




Keawanui Fishpond March 9, 2011


Keawanui Fishpond March 23, 2011

As you can perhaps see from the photos, before the tsunami, Keawanui was an completely enclosed pond.  The tsunami tore away the majority of the pond wall.  The wall will need to be completely rebuilt.  They are estimating it will take at least one year to rebuild the wall.

Essential supplies are needed now.  This includes materials to repair the barge and floaters; boat supplies; necessary gear for working on the wall (gloves, shoes, etc).  $5,000 will be enough to get this work started.  Please help if you can.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Lecture: Cultural Significance of the Hawaiian Monk Seal, Wed. Feb 16 (KIHEI)

Sanctuary Lecture Series

CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF
THE HAWAIIAN MONK SEAL
Dr. Trisha Kehaulani Watson
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
6:00 PM
Kihei Learning Center
726 S. Kihei Rd.



Sanctuary Lecture handout

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Kilakila o Kanaloa: New Website Featuring Hawaiian Coastal Research

Aloha kakou! 

I am so pleased to annouce our new website http://www.kilakilaokanaloa.org/ which features resources on coastal resources.  Please visit and enjoy!




Nā Kapu Kai: Successfully Integrating Indigenous Epistemologies into Western Conservation Policies and Practices

Nā Kapu Kai:
Successfully Integrating Indigenous Epistemologies into Western Conservation Policies and Practices

(Remarks Given at the Sharing Power Conference, January 13, 2011 - Whakatane, Aotearoa)

                Kapu is one of those native words that got colonized.  Today, foreigners use it in Hawai`i in conjunction with a symbolic “X” to mark off that which is taboo or forbidden.  And while one of the meanings or interpretations of the word can mean forbidden, it is better understood to mean “regulated” and/or “sacred.”  Therefore, when I come before you today to speak of “Nā Kapu Kai” I come to speak both of how indigenous people not only defined what was ecologically sacred but to speak about the reality that all indigenous peoples took steps to regulated and managed their sacred resources.  You see, conservation and natural resource management are not new, nor western constructs – they are inherently indigenous. 

                I am the lineal descendant of both chiefs and colonizers.  My respective ancestors excelled in both.  I am more recently the granddaughter of a Hawaiian civil engineer and daughter of a hunter and fisherman.  I grew up in a family where both math and fishing were necessities.  Yet, more often than not, you will never find me in family photos.  After my grandfather passed, my family gathered to go through family albums.  At some point, someone noticed that I seemed to be in no pictures.  Challenged by this, my entire family searched albums wondering why I was in no photos, until a cousin finally spotted me in one – in the background, in a corner, reading a book. 

                I finished two bachelors by 22; a master’s in American Studies a year later, with a thesis that looked at environmental racism in Hawai`i; I completed by law degree plus an environmental law certificate three years after that in 2003, and if that weren’t enough I then went back to complete a PhD in American Studies specializing in indigenous epistemologies and traditional natural resource management.  I was plucked from the ranks along the way to work in research and environmental compliance at the University of Hawai`i.  Two years ago I left to start my own native consulting company.  Today, I advise governments on cultural and environments issues.

                I need to note with a great deal of conviction that any success I have seen has been due to the fact that I work with people in government agencies who have shown an extraordinary willingness to work with me and other indigenous people.  I consider myself blessed to work with such wonderful, non-native scientists and managers.  This is not to say that there are not challenges, but working with people who have helped to craft solutions has given me much greater insight into where the systemic difficulties remain. 

                So let’s get into the problems, so we can talk about solutions.

                First, “environmental problems” are defined by western science, not indigenous knowledges of realities.  It is not enough that we have been howling that our environments have been under attack for years.  Until there is “science” to show it, the problem does not exist.

                Therefore, western science defines the problem.  They control the science.  They dictate policy, and thereby the money and mandates.  From policy, money and mandates we return again to science, still controlled by the west.  Then comes “management,” still a western controlled practice.  Then finally, implementation, when maybe, just maybe – indigenous people will be considered “stakeholders” and be “consulted.” 

                The system is biased. 

                But there is a system.  And when you know the system, you can change it. 

                So let’s discuss solutions and success:

FIND YOUR CHAMPIONS

They are individuals.  They are the cogs in the machine who want to help; who know they need to help.  If you are a native person – find your champion.  If you are not native – become a champion.  

Once you have made your match, it is up to the indigenous people at the table.

Native people: first, get in the door.  Second, be great. 

How do you get in the door?  True, finding a champion is not enough.  The bottom line is education.  We live in a world where letters after you name count.  Get them.  Use them.  If you cannot get them, make sure your children do.  Neither of my parents graduated from college, but they made sure I did.

If you get in the door, you must be great.  It is not enough to be good.  Be great.  Be ready to lead, and lead well, for from your actions as one, all your people will be judged.  It is a reality of being indigenous.  If you succeed, you will be able to open the door for others.  If you fail, the door shuts to all of you. 

It is important to note that greatness is not greatness by a western standard.  Yes, that factors in, but it is not the key factor.  Greatness comes from being good at what you do.  Every time I’ve been hired by a government entity, they tell me what they want and need.  Most times, I immediately turn around and tell them that what they want and need is neither what they want nor need. 

The ability to do this comes from four factors:

1.  I have the academic background (so people don’t question my qualifications);
2.  I have the experience and thereby confidence to make good management decisions;
3.  I listen to my kūpuna and community; and
4.  I listen to the land.      

I never realized how important self-confidence was until I got into my thirties.  It was only then that I started to pick my fights.  (I picked my fights when I was younger too, but the problem was that I was picking every fight.) 

It is important to pick your fights, and it is important to develop the emotional maturity to keep your passion under control. 

Americans have a song, “This land is your land… this land is my land.” 

This absurd song and its chorus of land ownership helped to identify the bizarre struggle between natives and non-natives over ecological relationships.  I like to call it “the competition for Earth Mother’s love.”  The reality is that when it comes to conservation and management, both sides need to get past the competition over who is more committed to the land. 

I have no doubt that most people love the land. 

I imagine that for non-natives, when environmental degradation occurs, it is as if you are watching a woman being beaten.  And it elicits emotion and passion, because no woman should be abused or beaten.  But for us, for indigenous people, it is as if we are watching our mother being raped.  And we have been watching it for hundreds of years.

We love her too. 

And however we got here, however we see her, we now share her. 

We must set aside fighting over her and get to saving her. 

Therefore, western science must immediately start to better value native models of environmental commitment, knowledge and ecological excellence.  And native people need to stop acting as if our ecological practices were stagnant.  We were innovative and brilliant; one did not exist absent the other.  We were scientists, engineers, biologists – we must not be afraid to charge into those fields.  Valuable data exists in our knowledges – and our ancestors used it to define, regulate and protect our sacred resources.  We must continue to do the same. 

And we must charge into those fields in which indigenous people globally remain underrepresented while embracing indigenous ecological methodologies.  I have yet to discover an indigenous people whose knowledge systems did not encompass three basic principles:

1.  They were non-linear
2.  They utilized multiple epistemologies
3.  They embraced multiple ontologies

For native people, spirit and science are not only non-exclusive, but they are symbiotic. 

So I come with specific advice:

Non-Natives:  two words, LET GO.

Let go of your ego.
Let go of your need to know everything.
Let go of your need to quantify and rationalize everything.
Let go of your need to access and control.
Please let go of your need to speak and act for us. 

Native People: six words, BE PATIENT.  BE PERSISTANT.  BE RESILIANT.

My kūpuna only ever gave me two pieces of advice: ho’omanawanui and pololei.

Ho`omanawanui: Be patient.  Pololei: Stay on the right course.  Those two words have shaped by life.

Patience is perhaps easy to understand, but staying on the right course is often harder for people.

I do so by following basic cultural protocols.

Kūpuna is our word for elders.  `Āina is our word for land.  The two have much in common.  `Āina literally translated to “that which feeds us.”  Therefore, I see kūpuna as `āina too.  They also feed me, as the land feeds me.  They feed me knowledge and guidance. 

In my culture it is rude to not eat what you are given.  I apply this to the community and the kūpuna.  I take in everything that is put in front of me.  I treat all of it as a gift.  And I think that it is important to point out to the youth here that this is a symbolic practice with wide implications. 

As youth, you are simply fed by others.  You only job is to digest what you are given. 

As you become older, your role changes.  You can develop preferences for what and where you eat.  You learn to gather and prepare food for yourselves.  You become responsible for feeding others. 

Learn to apply this principle to knowledge and leadership.    

So in summary, find your champions, but we must all also find the champions within ourselves.

I must admit that I have trouble with the theme of this conference: shared power.

What power?  Nature has all the power.  She always has.

Our transformation must be one into a shared vision for survival.

Not for the land, she will survive us. 

Not for us, we have it easy. 

The reason we are here, the reason any of us are really here is that we know we must implement a shared path of survival for our children, and for their children and their children’s children.

It is for those who shall inherit our consequences tomorrow that we must become champions  today.